Stacklane

Engineering velocity, measured and owned.

The brief

Build a developer team velocity platform for post-raise startups. Landing, product detail, investor-facing page, early access waitlist. The brief: rigorous, evidence-led, technically consistent — no fake real-time claims.

Intake result: Mapped to Pro + Funded Startup pack on intake. Investor narrative, architecture documentation, unit economics, and cross-dimensional consistency all map to the Funded Startup pack configuration.

Key agents

Who ran, and what they produced.

@pitch-strategistDefine investor narrative — category frame, why now, moat

Category: "Developer team velocity" adjacent to incident management. Why now: AI code generation creating a measurement gap. Moat: longitudinal velocity dataset, not the dashboard UI.

@architectDesign technical architecture — multi-workspace SaaS ingesting GitHub + Linear

Event ingestion via webhooks, async scoring pipeline with 14-day rolling window, per-workspace RLS data isolation, read-only API for investor due diligence integrations.

@business-analystBuild unit economics model — $299/month per workspace

$179,400 ARR at 50-workspace year-one target. LTV/CAC 14.9× at 24-month average contract. Breakeven at 200 workspaces.

@content-writerWrite landing hero, product breakdown, early access CTA for a developer audience

"Know if your team is actually moving." + 3-part product breakdown (ingest, score, act) + early access section with credibility anchor.

@pitch-strategistWrite investors page — category definition, market framing, the ask

Structured investor page: category definition, TAM framing ($4.2B dev tooling, $800M addressable in team analytics), traction placeholder, founder contact form.

@risk-officerReview investor page and unit economics for unsupportable claims

2 flags: TAM figure needed sourcing attribution; "real-time velocity scores" inconsistent with 14-day rolling window. Recommended "real-time" → "continuous".

Build time

3 sessions · ~4.5 hours

From first message to deployable output.

Hardest decision

@risk-officer catching the "real-time" claim conflict with the architecture brief — a subtle inconsistency a technical investor would catch. Required coordinating a fix between @senior-developer (architecture note) and @content-writer (landing copy) in the same session.

What this proves

The Funded Startup pack coordinates across investor-facing, technical, and commercial dimensions simultaneously — pitch narrative, architecture rationale, and unit economics that are internally consistent. Answers: "AI can help with copy but not with investor-grade rigor."

Get the Funded Startup pack for your repo.

Answer 5 intake questions. The Funded Startup pack ships in your Pro or Growth download — configured for your project.

Start the intake →← Back to showcase